The political slandering match between the BJP and Opposition over the transfer of Katchatheevu Island to Sri Lanka in 1974, which was facilitated by the then-chief minister of the betway login party in Tamil Nadu, has reached a level playing field. The central question is whether the transfer of this one-mile-long island was based on personal animosity between leaders or whether it was authorized by the cabinet of Indira Gandhi.

Since its signing in 1974, the India-Bangladesh Land Boundary Agreement has been in effect since June 6, 2015. It was ratified by the Union Cabinet, led by Narendra Modi, and the 100th Constitutional Amendment Bill was approved by Parliament on May 7, 2015. A unanimous vote in both chambers of Parliament 41 years later ratified the land boundary agreement that was initially established in 1974 between Prime Minister Indira Gandhi and her Bangladeshi counterpart, Sheikh Mujib-ur-Rehman.

No evidence yet exists that the Union Cabinet authorized the transfer of dafa login mobile Island from then-Prime Minister Indira Gandhi to then-Prime Minister Sirimavo Bandaranaike in 1974, in exchange for the relinquishment of Indian fishing rights in 1976. This dispute is currently pending in the Apex Court. Moreover, in spite of the fact that the incident pertained to the transfer of sovereign Indian territory to Sri Lanka, parliamentary sanction was lacking.

It is approximately 300 yards in diameter and one mile in length, according to MEA notes made public pursuant to the RTI. 18 miles separate it from Rameshwaram Island, 10.5 miles separate it from Delft Island (Ceylon), and 20.1 miles separate it from the Mannar coast (Ceylon). It is situated in Palk Bay.

Katchatheevu Island, despite being characterized as a solitary rock island during that period of political leadership, extends Indian fishery rights into Indian waters. Concern arises regarding the possibility that India transferred its sovereign territory to Sri Lanka for personal gain and to protect the political career of Ms. Bandaranaike, with no explicit or tangible benefits for India. Even worse, the DMK, which was a signatory to the transfer in the first place, now holds the Modi administration accountable for fishing rights over Kachchathivu.

This situation is comparable to when former Indian my 11 circle apk acknowledged the Chinese military occupation of Tibet in 1949. Neither India nor China received any tangible benefits in return, nor did Beijing provide any assurances regarding Nehru’s “forward policy,” which ultimately resulted in the detrimental 1962 war.